[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Bug: #+STARTUP: overview and org-startup-folded have no effect [
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Bug: #+STARTUP: overview and org-startup-folded have no effect [7.9.3e (7.9.3e-1032-g791a8d @ /home/horn/Repos/el/org-mode/lisp/)] |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Mar 2013 10:26:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Tassilo,
Tassilo Horn <address@hidden> writes:
> Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> I have seven agenda files, all not too big (~10K on average), and I
>>> use an averagely performant computer (5 years old dual core laptop).
>>> For me, the difference between `org-agenda-inhibit-startup' set to t
>>> or nil is not noticable at all. In both cases, it's less than a
>>> second, and that's a time I can easily live with.
>>
>> It really depends on what your agenda views are.
>>
>> The real test is this: create a 50K file with folded one headline and
>> many second level TODO entries.
>
> Ok, the testfile looks like
>
> * The folded top-level headline
>
> ** TODO Some test todo headline 0
>
> - also some contents
>
> ** TODO Some test todo headline 1
>
> - also some contents
>
> and has 2000 such subheadlines. File size is 127K.
> `org-startup-folded' is t.
That's not a very good test file, because you just need to unfold the
main headline to get all headlines visible.
I tested with a test.org file using this structure:
* Test
** TODO Test
*** Test
repeated 10k times. Then run emacs -Q -l ~/test.el with the
attached test.el file, I get sensible results here.
I don't think it varies depending on the Emacs 23 vs 24 version,
but I believe we are using the same.
PS: I will revert `org-agenda-inhibit-startup' to nil as a default
and will explain why in another mail.
test.el
Description: application/emacs-lisp
--
Bastien
- Re: [O] Bug: #+STARTUP: overview and org-startup-folded have no effect [7.9.3e (7.9.3e-1032-g791a8d @ /home/horn/Repos/el/org-mode/lisp/)],
Bastien <=