[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze
From: |
Michael Brand |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Feb 2013 21:50:06 +0100 |
Hi Samuel
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Samuel Loury <address@hidden> wrote:
> [...]
> I quite agree with you. It is also the way I understood it, with the
> automatic removal of the -3d.
>
> Only a tiny glitch there, I suppose you guessed it was written
>
> SCHEDULED: <2013-02-01 Fri +1m -3d>
>
> and not
>
> SCHEDULED: <2013-02-01 Fri +1w -3d>
> [...]
Yes, my bad... Thanks for pointing out.
Michael
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Bastien, 2013/02/07
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Michael Brand, 2013/02/07
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Samuel Loury, 2013/02/09
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze,
Michael Brand <=
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Bastien, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Michael Brand, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Michael Brand, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Bastien, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Bastien, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Michael Brand, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Samuel Loury, 2013/02/13
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Bastien, 2013/02/13
Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Andrew M. Nuxoll, 2013/02/12