Re: [O] org-caldav feedback

[David Engster]

Torsten Wagner writes:
> I see the problem that you might changed the text in the summary field in the
> caldav calendar, which potentially mess up the header (where to place the old
>  timestamp within the context of the new text?!) but for now, I would suggest
> to simply search for a timestamp within the node-header and update it by 
> adding
> a new timestamp at the very end (but before tags ;) ).

Yes, something like this needs to be done. As I've written in my last
mail, I'm hoping for a more general solution. I'm guessing that
org-elements can help me with this, but I haven't yet looked at it in
detail.

> In addition a new variable
>
> org-caldav-timestamp-pos which can be either "header" or "body"
>
> could indicate where to place the timestamp for a new entry coming from 
> caldav.

Hmm. What are the advantages of putting it in the header?

-David