[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility
From: |
Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 07:10:29 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hello Achim,
I have emacs 22 installed on one system.
,----[/usr/bin/emacs --version]
| GNU Emacs 22.3.1
| Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
| GNU Emacs comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
| You may redistribute copies of Emacs
| under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
| For more information about these matters, see the file named COPYING.
`----
I just tried building. it was successful although there are lot of warnings.
build logs are attached in case if you are interested to look into.
$ make 1> make.log 2>error.log
make.log
Description: Binary data
error.log
Description: Binary data
On 12月 19 2012, Achim Gratz <address@hidden> wrote:
> Bastien writes:
>> I think a reasonable expectation is to be fully compatible with
>> the last two major versions of GNU Emacs (23 and 24).
>
> It would help if I managed to get Emacs 23 to compile Org… but since
> some people on the list are still using Emacs23 and they don't report
> problems I'm assuming it's rather something in my build ATM, although
> I've built Emacs 23 with the same parameters before (just a different
> compiler).
>
>> For Emacs 22 and XEmacs, if we have people using these Emacsen, maybe
>> they can help?
>
> Emacs 22 is already broken in non-trivial ways AFAICS and the question
> is if its worth the effort to unbreak it. There are some things I've
> looked at (like macro expansion inside a macro, as it is used in
> org-odt) that should work, but apparently don't. I have no idea if the
> byte-code that is generated has a chance of working, but it looks quite
> strange. UTF-8 support is another sore point that currently shoots down
> startup of the test suite if I interpret the error messages correctly.
>
> I'm not sure which is the last version that fully works with Emacs 22,
> even to find that out would take quite some time.
>
>> I'm reluctant to drop support for Emacs 22/XEmacs as it would
>> block those volunteers.
>
> I have somewhat more hope for XEmacs, although many of the newer
> additions to Org would need to be reviewed for compatibility problems.
>
>
> Regards,
> Achim.
Thanks.,
--
ఎందరో మహానుభావులు అందరికి వందనములు
YYR
- [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Achim Gratz, 2012/12/15
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Nick Dokos, 2012/12/15
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Jambunathan K, 2012/12/15
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Achim Gratz, 2012/12/16
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Bastien, 2012/12/18
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Achim Gratz, 2012/12/18
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility,
Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala <=
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Bastien, 2012/12/18
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala, 2012/12/19
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Bastien, 2012/12/19
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Achim Gratz, 2012/12/19
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Bastien, 2012/12/19
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Achim Gratz, 2012/12/19
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Bastien, 2012/12/24
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Achim Gratz, 2012/12/19
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Jambunathan K, 2012/12/19
- Re: [O] Emacs 22 compatibility, Achim Gratz, 2012/12/19