Re: [O] "Generic" Source block language specification?

[Eric Schulte]

Rainer M Krug <address@hidden> writes:

> On 23/11/12 00:17, Eric Schulte wrote:
>> Rainer M Krug <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> I have in a document a definition of a projection, which is essentially a 
>>> text as follow:
>>> 
>>> #+BEGIN_src +proj=aea +lat_1=-28.25 +lat_2=-29.75 +lat_0=29 +lon_0=30.75 
>>> +x_0=0 +y_0=0 
>>> +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs #+END_src
>>> 
>>> Now this does obviously not export, as the source block language is 
>>> missing. Is there a way
>>> that I can get the same formating of the source in the exportes output but 
>>> without the syntax
>>> highlighting?
>>> 
>>> BEGIN_EXAMPLE END_EXAMPLE
>>> 
>>> is similar, but I would like the block to be formated as the SRC blocks.
>>> 
>> 
>> I bet "fundamental" would work, e.g.,
>
> Yes, it does - works perfectly. Is this documented?
>

Yes.  Whatever language string is placed at the top of the source block
will define the mode used for export and in-block editing.  I believe
that is documented.

Cheers,

>
> Thanks,
>
> Rainer
>
>> 
>> #+begin_src fundamental +proj=aea +lat_1=-28.25 +lat_2=-29.75 +lat_0=29 
>> +lon_0=30.75 +x_0=0 
>> +y_0=0 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs #+end_src
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Rainer
>> 
>

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte