[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] subtree-export limitations
From: |
Philipp Kroos |
Subject: |
Re: [O] subtree-export limitations |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Nov 2012 13:25:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Ok, thanks to both of you. I'll stick with the workarounds pointed out
by Alan for now.
Anyway, I'm still curious if it wouldn't be feasible to treat
subtree-options more similar to inbuffer-options?
Maybe I'll have a look at that in some spare time, though I think my
understanding of the concepts might be insufficient yet. Any further
clues on this topic are much appreciated therfore!
Best regards, Philipp
Suvayu Ali <address@hidden> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 04:45:35PM +0100, Philipp Kroos wrote:
>>
>> So would be any other EXPORT_OPTIONS-line. The responsible function is
>> org-export--get-subtree-options, which builds a list of already seen
>> keywords. The lists members are then ignored if seen again.
>> Is there any particular reason why this is done?
>>
>
> Since Alan gave you a workaround, I will try to answer the why. I
> believe the reason behind this behaviour is properties are not designed
> to "accumulate" values. I believe there is a special case treatment for
> certain babel uses; as I'm hazy on the details, you have to look in the
> archives from about a year back (my memory tells me September 2011 to
> December 2011). You should look for discussions involving Rainer(?)
> and Eric Schulte.
>
> Hope this helps.
- [O] subtree-export limitations, Philipp Kroos, 2012/11/16
- Re: [O] subtree-export limitations, Alan Schmitt, 2012/11/16
- Re: [O] subtree-export limitations, Suvayu Ali, 2012/11/16
- Re: [O] subtree-export limitations,
Philipp Kroos <=
- Re: [O] subtree-export limitations, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/11/17
- Re: [O] subtree-export limitations, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/11/17
- Re: [O] subtree-export limitations, Philipp Kroos, 2012/11/17
- Re: [O] subtree-export limitations, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/11/17
- Re: [O] subtree-export limitations, Philipp Kroos, 2012/11/18
- Re: [O] subtree-export limitations, Alan Schmitt, 2012/11/19