emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] [PATCH] Fixing when org-clock-in-prepare-hook is called


From: Sebastien Vauban
Subject: Re: [O] [PATCH] Fixing when org-clock-in-prepare-hook is called
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:50:36 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (windows-nt)

Hello Myles,

"Myles English" wrote:
> From d7c3f0a4611ced0a240af9115f29f888beb60af2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Myles English <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:38:09 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Clocking: Move to task before calling
>  org-clock-in-prepare-hook
>
> * lisp/org-clock.el (org-clock-in): Moved the call to
> org-clock-in-prepare-hook until the task's properties
> can be accessed.
>
> The problem was when using a function to add an effort
> property via the hook, it would not recognise an existing
> effort property when called with the prefix (C-u C-c C-x C-i)
> with the point at a place other than at the task.
>
> TINYCHANGE
> ---
>  lisp/org-clock.el | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lisp/org-clock.el b/lisp/org-clock.el
> index e5488e4..84eb2fd 100644
> --- a/lisp/org-clock.el
> +++ b/lisp/org-clock.el
> @@ -1149,7 +1149,6 @@ make this the default behavior.)"
>           (if (and (eobp) (not (org-at-heading-p)))
>               (point-at-bol 0)
>             (point)))
> -      (run-hooks 'org-clock-in-prepare-hook)
>        (save-excursion
>       (when (and selected-task (marker-buffer selected-task))
>         ;; There is a selected task, move to the correct buffer
> @@ -1168,6 +1167,7 @@ make this the default behavior.)"
>             ;; beginning of the heading, since the
>             ;; user is liking to insert stuff here
>             ;; manually
> +           (run-hooks 'org-clock-in-prepare-hook)
>             (org-clock-history-push))
>           (org-clock-set-current)
>           (cond ((functionp org-clock-in-switch-to-state)

That hits me for months...

Tested your patch: the promised behavior does work as expected. Thanks!

Best regards,
  Seb

--
Sebastien Vauban




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]