[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Problem with org-entities-user
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Problem with org-entities-user |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:15:34 +0200 |
Hello,
address@hidden (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
> I'm not sure about support for \hfill{}, etc. The new latex and html
> exporters pass \hfill{} through unchanged, which might be what the latex
> author wants, or what the html author writing about latex commands
> wants.
It would not change anything for the HTML author, since \hfill{} would
be exported as-is in any exporter. Though, it would be a less convenient
for the LaTeX author, who would have to type @@latex:\hfill{}@@.
On the other hand, I see at lest 3 reasons to remove support for such
constructs:
- consistency :: it's not possible to write raw HTML in an Org buffer,
nor raw Texinfo. LaTeX shouldn't be treated
differently.
- clarity :: Recently, an user expected the \cite{} command to work in
a backend different from LaTeX.
- ecumenism :: Removing LaTeXisms will make Org documents easier to
export to various back-ends.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- [O] Problem with org-entities-user, Thomas S. Dye, 2012/09/16
- Re: [O] Problem with org-entities-user, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/09/17
- Re: [O] Problem with org-entities-user, Thomas S. Dye, 2012/09/17
- Re: [O] Problem with org-entities-user, Carsten Dominik, 2012/09/20
- Re: [O] Problem with org-entities-user, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/09/20
- Re: [O] Problem with org-entities-user, Carsten Dominik, 2012/09/20
- Re: [O] Problem with org-entities-user, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/09/22
- Re: [O] Problem with org-entities-user, Carsten Dominik, 2012/09/22
- Re: [O] Problem with org-entities-user, Thomas S. Dye, 2012/09/22