[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp
|
From: |
suvayu ali |
|
Subject: |
Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp |
|
Date: |
Tue, 29 May 2012 21:04:41 +0200 |
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Samuel Wales <address@hidden> wrote:
> in case it's relevant to bisecting.
Nick already diagnosed the bug for us. :)
org-at-timestamp-p is the culprit.
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
- [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Samuel Wales, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Samuel Wales, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp,
suvayu ali <=
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Samuel Wales, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Matt Lundin, 2012/05/31