[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp
From: |
Nick Dokos |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp |
Date: |
Tue, 29 May 2012 14:43:11 -0400 |
Samuel Wales <address@hidden> wrote:
> FWIW, I have noticed this for a long time, actually, only worse. If
> you RET after a period after link, it still thinks it's a link. And
> the link followed is broken.
>
> IIRC.
>
IME, not so: I just tried RET right after a link and got a newline
inserted into the buffer.
I also tried pressing RET after a period inserted after the link (and
also after the timestamp): in both cases, RET never tried to follow the
link - it just inserted a newline.
Nick
- [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Samuel Wales, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp,
Nick Dokos <=
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Samuel Wales, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, suvayu ali, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Samuel Wales, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Matt Lundin, 2012/05/31