Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda

[Nicolas Richard]

Le Tue, 08 May 2012 16:10:02 +0200, Bastien a écrit :
> Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> Oh, I agree - the removal is certainly desirable. I meant whether the
>> non-removal of not-today's date is intentional :-)
> 
> Thinking about this again, I don't see any reason why we should keep any
> timestamp in the headline.  I pushed a fix for this.


Hello,

PMJI, but I often used to construct headlines such as

* Some course (or any other kind of recurring meeting)
** <2012-05-08 mar.>
** <2012-05-15 mar.>
** <2012-05-22 mar.>

and then filling the level two headlines as I attend the lectures. This
situation sometimes creates an error message when building the agenda
view, so now I use

* Some course
** Lecture <2012-05-08 mar.>
** Lecture <2012-05-15 mar.>
** Lecture <2012-05-22 mar.>

I understand from your post that this way of doing things should
be avoided, right ? What would be the "correct way" ?

I guess I could do something like :

* Some course
<2012-05-08 mar.> <2012-05-15 mar.> <2012-05-22 mar.>

and create headlines for each lecture as I attend them.

Best wishes,

-- 
Nico.