[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [babel] Call lines with "their own" results
From: |
Eric Schulte |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [babel] Call lines with "their own" results |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:57:45 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Andreas,
Currently call the behavior you mention below, in which call line
results are named by their arguments and are not unique, is the
implemented behavior. I agree that it would be preferable to switch to
a system in which each call line was given it's own results, however I
am not able to make this change right now (although it is on my TODO
list).
I think for now a workaround like the one you suggest below (or maybe
using an "id" header argument) is probably your best bet.
Best,
Andreas Leha <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a way to force #+call line to have their own results block?
> Or what is the best practice to achieve that?
> I remember that there was a thread on this recently...
>
> Example:
> #+name: sampleblock
> #+begin_src R :colnames yes
> data.frame(par=1, val=1)
> #+end_src
>
> I can call this block:
> #+call: sampleblock()
>
> #+results: sampleblock()
> | 1 | 1 |
>
> Now, I want to call this block with different arguments, but instead
> of placing the results here, the result block above gets updated.
> #+call: sampleblock() :colnames yes
>
>
>
> Note: I can cheat to achieve this, but is this the best way?
> #+call: sampleblock(execute="!") :colnames yes
>
> #+results: sampleblock(execute="!")
> | par | val |
> |-----+-----|
> | 1 | 1 |
>
>
>
--
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/