emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] how to specify table width in HTML export


From: Nick Dokos
Subject: Re: [O] how to specify table width in HTML export
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:42:48 -0400

Michael Hannon <address@hidden> wrote:

> > From: Nick Dokos <address@hidden>
> >
> > Stephen J. Barr <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> This seems like a simple question but I can't seem to find the answer?
> >> How do I specify the table width for an org-table that I will export
> >> to HTML?
> >>
> >
> > Not sure about the real HTMl syntax, or whether this is the best
> > solution (I'd imagine CSS would be better *if* it can be done with CSS)
> > but the following:
> >
> > #+ATTR_HTML: width="100"
> > | col1 | col2 |
> > |------+------|
> > |    1 |    3 |
> > |      |      |
> >
> > gets translated into an HTML table with an opening tag like this:
> >
> > <table  border="2" cellspacing="0"
> > cellpadding="6" rules="groups" frame="hsides"
> > width="100">
> >
> > Does that do the trick?
> 
> Indeed, I think CSS would be a better approach.  And of course I don't know
> what this particular application is, but it's usually better to specify the
> width of objects as a percentage of the overall width.
> 

Just to make sure

#+ATTR_HTML: width="50%"

is just the "same" as far as the HTML exporter is concerned: it'll just blindly
tack it to the <table ...> tag.

> This is discussed, for instance, at:
> 
>     http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_table.asp
> 

Nice reference, thanks! Particularly for those (like me) whose CSS fu is
weak to non-existent.

> Here's a line from one of my old .org files that shows the syntax:
> 
>     #+STYLE:    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="./junk.css" />
> 
> It's also possible to embed the styling information directly in the Org-mode
> file, but I find that to be less convenient, as you then have to re-export to
> make a change to the style.
> 
> Caveat: I haven't done any HTML exporting to speak of lately, certainly none
> that has involved CSS, so it may be that the syntax has changed (i.e.,
> compared to the above STYLE directive).
> 

I think things have not changed in this area.

Nick



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]