Re: [O] Bug in odt export of org files with footnotes

[Jambunathan K]

Martin

I am attaching a patch that should fix this issue. I will let Nicolas
review/apply it.

ps: If you are not comfortable applying patches, the best way to get
things working again, is to force a blank line before the first
non-commented line in your Org file i.e., replace

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[snip]
#+XSLT:
* Protocol
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

with 

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[snip]
#+XSLT:

* Protocol
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

in the test file that you circulated.

test.org
Description: test.org

0001-org-footnote-Workaround-a-limitation-in-the-ODT-expo.patch
Description: org-footnote.patch

Martin Gürtler <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi,
>
> thanks for quick response.
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 29.02.2012, 14:51 +0530 schrieb Jambunathan K:
>> Martin Gürtler <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>> I am not sure what version of Orgmode this corresponds to...What does
>> M-x org-version RET say.
> 7.8.03, I use elpa.
>
>> > There, the export of documents with footnotes seems to be broken. 
>> 
>> Footnote export in ODT was known to be broken[1] with the following is
>> true:
>> 
>> ,----
>> |   (setq org-footnote-section nil)
>> `----
>> 
>> May I know what value do you use one your end?
> C-h v says org-footnote-section's value is "Footnotes" which seems to
> be default and not the case you mention.
>> Providing a complete Org file (with footnotes) is necessary so that
>> there is no confusion on what we are looking at.
>> 
>> With a footnotes added, I was able to export just fine with the version
>> of Org in the git repo.
> In my case, section 1.1 is missing. I attach the org file with footnote
> and the resulting odt.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Martin