Re: [O] bug#9695: allowed date range

[Michael Brand]

Hi Carsten

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 19:18, Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> wrote:
> I have now merged this patch,

Thank you. I have still concerns about this, did I somehow miss the answer?:

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 18:22, Michael Brand <address@hidden> wrote:
> I wonder how C-c C-c with a prefix (supported are one to three C-u) on
> a time stamp in a table field is expected to behave. In my opinion it
> should not only adjust the day name but like before also evaluate the
> table formula which it does not now. If the user does not expect and
> check the missing logs of the table calculation update he might
> wrongly assume that it happened and assume that there has been just no
> change.

Michael