Re: [O] org-capture-template: "SCHEDULED:" obsolete?

[Marius Hofert]

Thanks a lot, Jan, that explained it very well.

Cheers,

Marius

On 2011-11-06, at 11:30 , Jan Böcker wrote:

> On 11/05/2011 11:35 PM, Marius Hofert wrote:
> 
>> Apparently, the string "SCHEDULED:" is not required for an entry to appear 
>> in agenda view. 
> 
> Hi Marius,
> 
> the difference between <date> and SCHEDULED: <date> is that <date> will
> cause the entry to appear in the agenda only on the given day, whereas
> SCHEDULED: <date> will also cause the entry to be displayed on the
> current day if it is scheduled in the past and has not been marked DONE yet.
> 
> To see what I mean, put the following entries into an agenda file:
> 
> * Test 1
>  SCHEDULED: <2011-11-05 Sat>
> 
> * DONE Test 2
>  SCHEDULED: <2011-11-05 Sat>
> 
> * Test 3
>  <2011-11-05 Sat>
> 
> Because Test 1 it is not marked done, if you refresh your agenda view
> today, you will see something like this:
> 
> Sched. 2x:  Test 1
> 
> Test 2 does not show up because it is marked DONE and Test 3 does not
> show up because it does not contain the SCHEDULED keyword.
> 
> (Note that Test 1 will only show up on the agenda view for today and the
> day it was scheduled for when you look at the agenda view for a day in
> the past or future, for example by using the weekly or monthly view or
> going forward/backward with the f and b keys.
> 
> For more information, please refer to Section 8.3, "Deadlines and
> scheduling", in the Org manual.
> 
> Hope this helps,
>  Jan