[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] C-c C-c not working at end of #+end_src line (was: [RFC] Standar
From: |
Daniel Bausch |
Subject: |
Re: [O] C-c C-c not working at end of #+end_src line (was: [RFC] Standardized code block keywords) |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Nov 2011 07:34:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.0.6-gentoo; KDE/4.6.5; i686; ; ) |
Am Montag 31 Oktober 2011, 20:01:14 schrieb Eric Schulte:
> Daniel Bausch <address@hidden> writes:
> > I did some tests with my documents and they look fine. Thanks for your
> > work.
>
> Great, good to know.
>
> > (A minor remark, offtopic: If the document ends just below a source
> > code block, no results are inserted when the block is executed. You
> > have to insert an additional blank line, for a result to can appear.)
>
> I can't reproduce this problem.
Ok, I played around and found that what I saw has nothing to do with a blank
line existing or not, but only with the position of point. What I observed
happens if point is at the end of the #+end_src line. If you press C-c C-c
there then you get "Local setup has been refreshed" if there is a newline
following. If the documents ends just there, then you get "org-mode
fontification error". In both cases no result is produced. I think it is a
very common case that one wants to execute a code block right after typing
#+end_src, so that point position should "belong" to the code block. If you
move one character left, so you are between r and c, then C-c C-c works as
expected.
If you need an example, use that
#+begin_src R
42
#+end_src
It even does not matter, whether there is additional text following.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [O] C-c C-c not working at end of #+end_src line (was: [RFC] Standardized code block keywords),
Daniel Bausch <=