emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords


From: Daniel Bausch
Subject: Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:58:58 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo-r3; KDE/4.6.5; i686; ; )

Am Dienstag 25 Oktober 2011, 19:21:22 schrieb Nick Dokos:
> Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Martyn Jago <address@hidden> writes:
> > > Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> > >> Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >>> Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I
> > >>> haven't yet voted, and although I would have though #+source: would
> > >>> have been the winner I like the simplicity of using #+name: for
> > >>> named code blocks as well as named data.  So I'll vote for #+name:
> > >>> here making it a tie, and I'll also take tie-breaking powers upon
> > >>> myself giving #+name: the win.
> > >> 
> > >> This is going to cost you, Schulte! It's not going to go down that
> > >> easily. I'll call the FTC, the FCC, the SCOTUS, the POTUS, the NYT,
> > >> the BDFL, the NFL and the MLB: an outrage I tell you! An affront to
> > >> the democratic rules some of us cherish! We'll fight to the death!
> > >> Who's with me?
> > 
> > Ha!
> > 
> > Well at least SCOTUS should be on my side, as they seem to have no
> > problem giving some people more freedom than others.
> 
> Indeed - but what about the NFL? I bet they have more integrity.
> 
> 
> On second thought...
> 
> > > +1 #+name
> 
> Back stabber!

Oops, I didn't want to split the community.  Be nice to each other.

> > Well thank goodness, even if I can't put my own thumb on the scale it
> > seems I can advertise enough to sway voters to my cause. :)
> 
> Bribery and Corruption - what is the world coming to?
> 
> > Cheers -- Eric
> > 
> > > mj




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]