Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

[Nick Dokos]

Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:

> Martyn Jago <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >> Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I haven't
> >>> yet voted, and although I would have though #+source: would have been
> >>> the winner I like the simplicity of using #+name: for named code blocks
> >>> as well as named data.  So I'll vote for #+name: here making it a tie,
> >>> and I'll also take tie-breaking powers upon myself giving #+name: the
> >>> win.
> >>> 
> >>
> >> This is going to cost you, Schulte! It's not going to go down that easily.
> >> I'll call the FTC, the FCC, the SCOTUS, the POTUS, the NYT, the BDFL, the
> >> NFL and the MLB: an outrage I tell you! An affront to the democratic rules
> >> some of us cherish! We'll fight to the death! Who's with me?
> >
> 
> Ha!
> 
> Well at least SCOTUS should be on my side, as they seem to have no
> problem giving some people more freedom than others.
> 

Indeed - but what about the NFL? I bet they have more integrity.


On second thought...

> >
> > +1 #+name
> >
> 

Back stabber!

> Well thank goodness, even if I can't put my own thumb on the scale it
> seems I can advertise enough to sway voters to my cause. :)
> 

Bribery and Corruption - what is the world coming to?

> Cheers -- Eric
> 
> >
> > mj
> >
> >
> 
> -- 
> Eric Schulte
> http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/
>