Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

[Daniel Bausch]

Hi,

>          named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function"
> calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob"
>                 named data [3] -- "tblname" "resname" "results" "data"

what about "#+name:" for [1] and [3], and "#+call:" for [2] ?

That a table or list contains data is obvious.  The only thing, the additional 
line is for, is to "name" it.  That a source block contains source is also 
obvious and is already noted by the use of #+begin_src, so why duplicate the 
"src"-part?

Daniel