[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] org-list-indent-offset only works partially
From: |
Michael Brand |
Subject: |
Re: [O] org-list-indent-offset only works partially |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:57:02 +0200 |
Hi Nicolas
Now I understand that
- 1 :: item 1
[TAB]- item 2
works as expected, when assuming that you don't want the space after
the "-" to change the indentation similar to Emacs Electric C but want
to keep only TAB, C-c and the modified cursor keys to change the
indentation. BTW, were there considerations or discussions about
"electric indentation" for lists (space after the "-")?
So, for what I want to do I have to use
- 1 :: item 1
-[TAB]item 2
Is the following also doing what is expected?
- 1 :: item 1
[TAB]-[TAB][TAB]item 2
Michael
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:33, Michael Brand <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I would like to suggest to treat this together with a similar issue:
>
> 1- Run "emacs -q"
> 2- M-x org-mode
> 3- open /tmp/t.org
> 4- Write the following
> - 1 :: item 1
> [TAB]- item 2
>
> When you press [TAB], "- item 2" is indented 7 spaces right. But I
> would expect it to be indented the same 2 spaces as if over the item 2
> line you do
>
> 5- M-left
> 6- M-right
>
> Michael
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:53, Sébastien Delafond <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> from Debian bug #645214 (http://bugs.debian.org/645214):
>>
>> org-mode doesn't seems to honour correctly the org-list-indent-offset
>> variable (a recent addition). See the following steps:
>>
>> 1- Run "emacs -q"
>> 2- M-x org-mode
>> 3- M-x set-variable org-list-indent-offset 8
>> 4- open /tmp/t.org
>> 5- Write the following
>> - item 1
>> [TAB]- item 2
>>
>> When you press [TAB], "- item 2" is indented only two spaces right,
>> not 8 as org-list-indent-offset describes, thats seems to be a
>> bug. But now, if over the item 2 line you do
>>
>> 6- M-left
>> 7- M-right
>>
>> The "- item 2" will be correctly indented 8 spaces to the right. So
>> org-list-indent-offset is correctly working in this case.
>>
>> There wasn't any patch provided by the submitter.