emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Surprising behaviour with agenda file


From: Daniel Bausch
Subject: Re: [O] Surprising behaviour with agenda file
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:25:14 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo-r3; KDE/4.6.5; i686; ; )

It's not a bug, it's a feature (although I don't know what it's for -- maybe 
speed).  However, there is a customizable option to switch it off:
org-agenda-skip-additional-timestamps-same-entry

Daniel

Am Donnerstag 29 September 2011, 14:16:10 schrieb Andreas Amann:
> Hi list,
> 
> I encounter the following surprising situation when using Org Agenda.
> 
> Suppose you have an agenda file which looks like this:
> ---- test.org ------
> * bar
> <2011-09-29 Thu 12:00>
> <2011-09-30 Fri 13:00>
> 
> 
> * foo
> <2011-09-29 Thu 15:00>
> <2011-09-29 Thu 16:00>
> --------------------
> 
> M-x  org-agenda-week-view
> then shows:
> --------------------
> Week-agenda (W39):
> Monday     26 September 2011 W39
> Tuesday    27 September 2011
> Wednesday  28 September 2011
> Thursday   29 September 2011
>                8:00...... ----------------
>               10:00...... ----------------
>   test:       12:00...... bar
>               12:00...... ----------------
>               13:09...... now - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - - 14:00...... ----------------
>   test:       15:00...... foo
>               16:00...... ----------------
>               18:00...... ----------------
>               20:00...... ----------------
> Friday     30 September 2011
>   test:       13:00...... bar
> Saturday    1 October 2011
> Sunday      2 October 2011
> 
> ----------------------
> 
> What surprises me, is that "foo" only appears once (Thurs 15:00)
> although I specified it twice in the agenda file. If the two entries in
> question refer to two different days, like "bar" in the above example,
> everything works as expected.
> 
> Is this a bug? If it is considered a feature I would be interested to
> know, how to work around it.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andreas





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]