Re: [O] [PATCH] Fix renumbering for footnotes at BOL.

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Tassilo Horn <address@hidden> writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

>> About your patch, I have but one question: I don't get a situation in
>> which the assert would be triggered, may you give me such an example?

> I don't either, and that's a good thing.  I added that just as some
> extra paranoia so that you get an error if a footnote gets broken.

Well, provided the first part of the function doesn't modify the buffer,
I still don't see how the assert could fail, even with a broken
footnote. Now, I may also be less paranoid than you are in that case.

Do you still think that assert should be a stayer? If so, I'll apply
your patch.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou