[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Bug: Column view in the agenda does not clean up ITEM [7.7]
From: |
Sebastien Vauban |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Bug: Column view in the agenda does not clean up ITEM [7.7] |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:49:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (windows-nt) |
Hi Christian,
Christian Schmidt wrote:
> I found out why the tags are still there in my column view directly
> in org-buffer: You are using "TAGS" for the column with the tags. I
> am using "ALLTAGS" instead, because I want to see the inherited tags
> as well. Unfortunately the column view does not treat the column
> ALLTAGS the same way it does treat the column TAGS (another bug?).
> When I use TAGS instead, the tag is removed as well, like at yours.
> But only when C-c C-x C-c is called directly on the _org-buffer_.
Yes, I did ask for column view on the source Org buffer.
> I still got the following issue, even with your configuration:
>
> C-c a L gives me the following agenda-buffer:
>
> Sonntag 7 August 2011
> Scheduled: NEXTACTION [#B] Test
> Montag 8 August 2011 W32
> Dienstag 9 August 2011
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mittwoch 10 August 2011
>
> Now I invoke in the same buffer, i. e. agenda-buffer, C-c C-x C-c and
> get:
>
> NEXTACTION | B | NEXTACTION [#B] Test :Tag: | :Tag: | | | 2011-08-07 So |
>
> Unfortunately still nothing gets cleaned up.
>
> Looking at your screenshot I wonder if the lower buffer does really
> show an Org-Agenda buffer after invoking C-c C-x C-c.
You're right. I did not understand -- maybe read too quickly -- that your
problem was when asking for column view _from the timeline view_.
I just tested it. I get the exact same behavior as the one you describe here;
unfortunately, then, I'm of no help.
Quick question: do you really need to call column view from within a timeline.
Isn't there a workaround to get the same lot of information, without going to
the timeline? Not sure about your use case...
But, yes, this sounds to me buggy as well. Maybe that's a corner case?
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban