emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Bug: Column view in the agenda does not clean up ITEM [7.7]


From: Sebastien Vauban
Subject: Re: [O] Bug: Column view in the agenda does not clean up ITEM [7.7]
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:49:18 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (windows-nt)

Hi Christian,

Christian Schmidt wrote:
> I found out why the tags are still there in my column view directly
> in org-buffer: You are using "TAGS" for the column with the tags. I
> am using "ALLTAGS" instead, because I want to see the inherited tags
> as well. Unfortunately the column view does not treat the column
> ALLTAGS the same way it does treat the column TAGS (another bug?).
> When I use TAGS instead, the tag is removed as well, like at yours.
> But only when C-c C-x C-c is called directly on the _org-buffer_.

Yes, I did ask for column view on the source Org buffer.

> I still got the following issue, even with your configuration:
>
> C-c a L  gives me the following agenda-buffer:
>
> Sonntag     7 August 2011
>   Scheduled:  NEXTACTION   [#B] Test
> Montag      8 August 2011 W32
> Dienstag    9 August 2011
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mittwoch   10 August 2011
>
> Now I invoke in the same buffer, i. e. agenda-buffer, C-c C-x C-c and
> get:
>
> NEXTACTION | B | NEXTACTION [#B] Test :Tag: | :Tag: | | | 2011-08-07 So |
>
> Unfortunately still nothing gets cleaned up.
>
> Looking at your screenshot I wonder if the lower buffer does really
> show an Org-Agenda buffer after invoking C-c C-x C-c.

You're right. I did not understand -- maybe read too quickly -- that your
problem was when asking for column view _from the timeline view_.

I just tested it. I get the exact same behavior as the one you describe here;
unfortunately, then, I'm of no help.

Quick question: do you really need to call column view from within a timeline.
Isn't there a workaround to get the same lot of information, without going to
the timeline?  Not sure about your use case...

But, yes, this sounds to me buggy as well. Maybe that's a corner case?

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]