Re: [O] Schedule event

[Jason Dunsmore]

"Sebastien Vauban" <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi Suvayu,
>
> suvayu ali wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Sebastien Vauban
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> Another idea would be to introduce another keyword like APPT an place
>>>> these time stamps also into the second line. That might be more easy to
>>>> implement.
>>>
>>> FWIW, my instinctive reaction would be: yes, great!  Maybe that clarifies
>>> the bits around dates: all active dates get keywords, only inactive ones
>>> are without any keyword.
>>
>> Yes, this would be a nice addition. I always find it difficult to decide how
>> to put regular timestamps too.
>
> By regular timestamps, you mean: inactive timestamps?

I think he means active timestamps with no keyword.  The Org FAQ and
manual refer to active timestamps with no keyword as "plain timestamps".

> Can you, maybe, comment on what makes the decision difficult?

At least for me, in my early Org days, I wasn't sure of the best
formatting convention for "plain timestamps".  I settled on putting them
on the line directly after the header with the proper indentation, since
this is how SCHEDULED items were inserted.

Regards,
Jason