[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [patch] Re: HTML Postamble is inside Content DIV
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [patch] Re: HTML Postamble is inside Content DIV |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:56:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jambunathan,
Jambunathan K <address@hidden> writes:
> Specifically can it do this:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2011-07/msg00524.html
We can modified the structure of `org-export-html-divs' so that it is an
alist instead of a list, with div ids and associated attributes.
If you think that's a good direction, can you provide a patch for this?
> I see that there has been a lot of ping-ponging around this area for a
> while now and you now seem to have a new proposal at hand. Your patch
> seems to be touching Bastien's commit pursuant to my above request
> [1].
Well, I didn't really like this proposed variable:
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(defcustom org-export-html-content-div "%s <div %s> %s"
"The name of the container DIV that holds all the page contents."
:group 'org-export-htmlize
:type 'string)
#+end_src
It is not simple enough to my eyes...
> I don't understand or use html or org-s5. I hope the proposal here
> is the final one :-).
I hope nothing is final in this world. :)
> Please make Eric Schulte a respondent or reviewer
> for this patch (from org-s5 side of things) and insist on a feedback
> from him before committing..
I committed this yesterday.
> ps: I would desire that any changes to org-html.el also need to be
> ported to org-lparse.el and (or) org-xhtml.el.
(Can you take charge of this?)
This is the main reason why having duplicate code in this area is a
burden.
I still think our energy will be better spent by progressively adding
things from org-xhtml.el to org-html.el, feature by feature. This is a
lot of (possibly boring) work, but being lazy now will just make it even
more difficult later.
In any case, working on porting changes from org-html.el to org-xhtml.el
isn't the right direction.
Let's keep up the good work!
Best,
--
Bastien