Re: [O] [patch] Re: HTML Postamble is inside Content DIV

[Jambunathan K]

"Sebastien Vauban"
<address@hidden> writes:

> Hi Pierre, Bastien et al.,
>
> Pierre de Buyl wrote:
>> Le 8 juil. 11 à 09:36, Sebastien Vauban a écrit :
>>>> Here is thus my proposition for a better div-structured HTML.
>>>>
>>>> There are only four parts required in the HTML for all the magic to work
>>>> with the CSS:
>>>>
>>>> - The first part is a container div ("content", by default) that
>>>> surrounds
>>>>   everything.
>>>>
>>>> - Inside that are three more parts:
>>>>   + a preamble (in a div, if the user wants it),
>>>>   + a div "body" and
>>>>   + a postamble (in a div, if the user wants it).
>>>
>>> Any objection for applying this patch?
>>
>> Not at all.
>
> After off-line discussion with Bastien, here is the updated proposition --
> and patch!
>
> There is no global DIV anymore directly inside the body, as there is already
> (in CSS) a virtual DIV called "#body"...
>
> Inside the "body" tags, 3 DIV:
>
> - "preamble" (useful for adding a static menu, outside of the "content" DIV)
> - "content" (by default, see "org-export-html-content-div")
> - "postamble"
>
> Preamble and postamble DIV are only inserted if they're not void.
>
> The "content" DIV (name free to be customized) will always be inserted.
>
> Any comment or objection?

Specifically can it do this:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2011-07/msg00524.html

I think having <div class="presentation"> is significant for org-s5
(though I haven't verified it). What the org-s5 use-case emphasizes is
that the user should have the flexibility to add attributes of his own
choosing to the div element and not merely the name of the id tag.

I see that there has been a lot of ping-ponging around this area for a
while now and you now seem to have a new proposal at hand. Your patch
seems to be touching Bastien's commit pursuant to my above request
[1]. I don't understand or use html or org-s5. I hope the proposal here
is the final one :-). Please make Eric Schulte a respondent or reviewer
for this patch (from org-s5 side of things) and insist on a feedback
from him before committing..

ps: I would desire that any changes to org-html.el also need to be
ported to org-lparse.el and (or) org-xhtml.el.

Jambunathan K.

>
> Best regards,
>   Seb


Footnotes: 

[1] I was not happy with Bastien's change which I felt was ignoring the
core of my proposal)

--