Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave

[Eric Schulte]

MidLifeXis at PerlMonks <address@hidden> writes:

> I tested this again over the weekend, and finally understood what you were 
> saying.
>
> I put a
>
> #+resname: blah
> : blahcontent
>
> and then I can use <<blah()>> to get "blahcontent" replaced without keeping 
> the newlines.
>
> Is this "abusing" resname, or is it a proper use of the keyword?  Will this 
> behavior be stable in the future?
>

This is not an abuse of inline results, and this behavior _will_ be
stable in the future.  Another optional alias for #+resname: which may
make more sense in this context is

#+data: blah
: blahcontent

Best -- Eric

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/