[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results
From: |
Eric S Fraga |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:38:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Schulte <address@hidden> writes:
> Eric S Fraga <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
>> this was working on Friday but seems to have stopped working for me now
>> completely. For instance, your snippet above exports as
>
> Hmm, have you updated Org-mode in the last hour/minutes, there have
> indeed been a number of changes recently. I believe that the above
> should be working now, without requiring any special configuration.
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you: work sometimes interrupts
and, just to add a little excitement in my life, we had a major lighting
storm yesterday which blew out my home network! :( But I can't
complain: a house down the street caught fire due to the same storm.
It's a lot cheaper and slightly less inconvenient to buy a new router
than rebuild a house...
In any case, everything seems to be working just fine now!
>> Also, I note from the comments that you expect the inline call to be
>> whitespace delimited. I haven't tested this but, just in case, could I
>> request that the delimiting be either whitespace or punctuation?
>
> As this behaves currently there need only be whitespace _before_ the
> inline call line, not after, so most normal punctuation usage should
> work.
Yes, that's fine. Thanks for the clarification!
[...]
>> There are cases where I would like the inline evaluation to be at the
>> end of a sentence, for instance, or even something like:
>
>>
>> 25^2=call_square(it=25)
>>
>
> hmm, good example, so what set of characters should be allowed to prefix
> and postfix such a block? For example, = before should export however =
> both before and after would be a literal example.
I don't know if you've done anything about this but I think it is
probably not worth worrying about these edge cases. It probably opens
up a can of worms and requiring a white space before the inline call is
fine with me.
Thanks again,
eric
--
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1
: using Org-mode version 7.5 (release_7.5.510.g56080)
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, (continued)
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Christian Moe, 2011/06/27
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/27
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Christian Moe, 2011/06/27
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Sebastien Vauban, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Sebastien Vauban, 2011/06/29
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/29
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/29
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric S Fraga, 2011/06/27
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/27
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results,
Eric S Fraga <=
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/29
Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Juan Pechiar, 2011/06/22