Re: [O] [PATCH] Allow inactive timestamps in org-expiry (copy of lost patch)

[David Maus]

At Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:55:13 -0400,
Nick Dokos wrote:
>
> Marcel van der Boom <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > This patch is what is attached to the message displayed at [1]. I have
> > been using this patch for a while and it works fine. From searching it
> > looks like this patch was 'forgotten', but I may have overlooked
> > something.
> >
> > If the patch was rejected, you can ignore me. If it was forgotten I'd
> > like to request to include it.
> >
>
> I don't think it was rejected outright, it looks as if it was
> inadvertently dropped. Probably part of the reason is that David sent
> the patches as application/octet-stream so they never made it to
> patchwork (was patchwork even running back in 2009? I don't remember
> when it was set up.)

IIRC Patchwork was set up in Summer 2010.


> The third part might be that it was Dec. 31, so people were out
> partying instead of applying patches (unimaginable, I know :-) )

Wow, I really did send this one Dec 31st 2009 - how time flies!

Best,
  -- Davdi
--
OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6
Jabber.... address@hidden
Email..... address@hidden

pgpG5Tk0HpPHL.pgp
Description: PGP signature