|
From: | Christian Moe |
Subject: | Re: [O] [dev] footnotes improvements |
Date: | Thu, 12 May 2011 12:48:01 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 5/12/11 12:04 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello, Christian Moe<address@hidden> writes:* HTML: works! One question: As is, adjoining footnotes `2' and `3' read as `23'. Could/should the footnote export know to put a comma between them:`2,3'? For HTML purposes, I think not necessarily, the separator could be flexibly added with CSS like: : #+style:<style>sup + sup .footref:before {content: ", "}</style>Probably, but I didn't change HTML exporter. I just made it compatible with the changes applied to the LaTeX one.
Anyway, the footnote markers are run together in LaTeX, too. So I think a (customizable?) separator would be a reader-friendly complement to this new adjacent footnote capability.
* Latex: backtrace:[...] Oops I had commented (require footnote) to see what happened and forgot to uncomment it again. This should be fixed now.
Yes, now it works.Did I mention how great it is that we can finally put links in inline footnotes?
Yours, Chrsitian
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |