emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[O] Re: Odd behavior with numbered list, footnotes, and LaTeX


From: John Hendy
Subject: [O] Re: Odd behavior with numbered list, footnotes, and LaTeX
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 12:08:30 -0500

On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> John Hendy <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> John Hendy <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> Just stumbled across something very odd I can't figure out. Here's a 
>>>> sample:
>>>> ,-----
>>>> | #+OPTIONS:   toc:t TeX:t LaTeX:t H:4 f:t todo:nil num:t tags:nil
>>>> | #+latex_class: article
>>>> |
>>>> | * Section
>>>> | 1. *A section*: a bunch of text is here and it seems like the
>>>> footnote is doing
>>>> |   something odd. [fn:1] More text here.
>>>> | 2. *A section*: a bunch of text is here and it seems like the
>>>> footnote is doing
>>>> |  something odd.
>>>> |
>>>> | * Footnotes
>>>> | [fn:1] www.google.com
>>>> `-----
>>>>
>>>> It seems that the footnote triggers LaTeX to end the enumerate
>>>> environment early for some reason. Not only that, but it seems to be
>>>> inserting \end{enumerate} *inside* the footnote:
>>>> ,-----
>>>> | \begin{enumerate}
>>>> | \item \textbf{A section}: a bunch of text is here and it seems like
>>>> the footnote is doing
>>>> |   something odd. \footnote{www.google.com
>>>> | \end{enumerate}
>>>> | } More text here.
>>>> |
>>>> | \begin{enumerate}
>>>> | \item \textbf{A section}: a bunch of text is here and it seems like
>>>> the footnote is doing
>>>> |   something odd.
>>>> | \end{enumerate}
>>>> `-----
>>>>
>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>
>>> This has been discussed in a recent thread, and I submitted a patch for
>>> that problem. I'm still waiting for feedback before applying it.
>>>
>>
>> Whoops on missing that... though I hope it gets fixed. I hadn't
>> updated one of my computers in a few months and know it wasn't giving
>> the bad behavior on there, so a change must have goofed something.
>
> I've pushed the patch. I tried it on your example and it seems to behave
> correctly. Though, do not hesitate to report back if any problem arises.
>

Yay! Flawless victory (well, for this simple example).


Many thanks,
John

> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]