[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Org-mode collaborative (multiple users working on the same set
From: |
Sébastien Vauban |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Org-mode collaborative (multiple users working on the same set of files) |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:33:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Eric, Benjamen, Daniel, and all,
>>> [...] What do you think about all this?
Thanks to get the debate launched. I was fearing to stay alone ;-)
Regarding the clocked times:
>> I just read this and before nobody answers, I'll give you a small POC
>> that should work for you. As far as I can tell it doesn't break
>> anything.
>>
>> (defun org-clock-out-mark-clock ()
>> (unless remove (insert (format " (%s)" user-full-name))))
>>
>> (add-hook 'org-clock-out-hook 'org-clock-out-mark-clock)
Yep, this seems to work perfectly -- did not catch any conflict yet, but usage
time still low.
Example results:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* My sub-project
:LOGBOOK:
CLOCK: [2010-06-14 Mon 09:15]--[2010-06-14 Mon 10:11] => 0:56 (Sebastien
Vauban)
- Test.
:END:
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Your proposed format seems nice to me.
Regarding other features, like state changes:
>> I [...] ask for [...] an identifier (something like `org-user-identifier')
>> to be added to the clock lines, so that we can filter based on the user,
>> when multiple people have clocked in the same documents.
>
> [...] I have been using org-mode files as a point of collaboration on a
> couple of projects (including org-babel [1]) and I think a generalization of
> something like your proposed `org-user-identifier' variable could be very
> useful for many of the org meta-data items associated with headlines.
Thanks for adding this in the loop. Of course, same combat...
> For example, it would be great to record the user responsible for every
> TODO state change, so that something like
>
> ** DONE Org-babel should work well when indented
> - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2010-06-10 Thu 15:48]
>
> would instead be
>
> ** DONE Org-babel should work well when indented
> - State "DONE" from "TODO" by eschulte [2010-06-10 Thu
> 15:48]
That'd be great. I now dream of the ability to get a "revision history" to be
easily inserted at the begin of a document, like all pros do.
> I think this would be very helpful, and anything that encourages the
> spread of Org-mode usage through co-workers is a big win.
I am sure this is a *must* for collaborative work, for being able to spread
the word. And I'm sure we're very close to get it -- like the above
proposition of Benjamen.
But, for being useful, it absolutely needs to be in the common base of Org, as
default behavior. If I need all my co-workers to add my specifics to their Org
customization, it's lost.
Best regards and thanks for your ideas.
Seb
--
Sébastien Vauban
- [Orgmode] org-remember and anything, (continued)
- [Orgmode] Re: org-remember and anything, Thierry Volpiatto, 2010/06/12
- [Orgmode] Re: org-remember and anything, Glauber Alex Dias Prado, 2010/06/14
- [Orgmode] Re: org-remember and anything, Thierry Volpiatto, 2010/06/14
- [Orgmode] Re: org-remember and anything, Glauber Alex Dias Prado, 2010/06/14
- [Orgmode] Re: org-remember and anything, rubikitch, 2010/06/26
- Re: [Orgmode] Debate about "One clock per user, but user is identified", Eric Schulte, 2010/06/12
- Re: [Orgmode] Debate about "One clock per user, but user is identified", Daniel Martins, 2010/06/12
- [Orgmode] Org-mode collaborative (multiple users working on the same set of files),
Sébastien Vauban <=
- [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode collaborative (multiple users working on the same set of files), Sébastien Vauban, 2010/06/22