[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] org-html link building diff
From: |
Tom Breton (Tehom) |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] org-html link building diff |
Date: |
Mon, 17 May 2010 20:59:32 -0400 |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.19 |
Hi, Carsten. The new changes are pushed as
tehom-html-export-refactor-build-link
I couldn't undo the basing onto tehom-master, try though I might.
Something to do with intermediate changes that I couldn't fast-forward
and that I probably edited wrong. So I made a separate branch,
tehom-html-export-refactor-build-link, which is now pushed to the
repo. So tehom-master and html-export-refactor-build-link are already
obsolete.
I moved the tests into top-level directory testing, as you asked. I'm
going to write a separate post describing the test conventions I use.
Now a question: IIUC you want a branch that has no tests, that
"contains only the changes that would go into org". Since I develop
tests and code at about the same time (tests slightly before code),
I'm not sure how to arrange the branching in a maintainable way.
I could of course make a one-time branch that just removes the testing
directory. But then what happens for any future fixes? Seems like
each time I'd have to rebase that branch and pick thru changes and
make it discard each change that deals with testing/. It seems hard
to maintain.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
- Re: [Orgmode] org-html link building diff, Carsten Dominik, 2010/05/01
- Re: [Orgmode] org-html link building diff, Carsten Dominik, 2010/05/16
- [Orgmode] Test-file naming conventions - mine and suggested for org, Tom Breton (Tehom), 2010/05/17
- [Orgmode] Re: Test-file naming conventions - mine and suggested for org, Carsten Dominik, 2010/05/21
- [Orgmode] Proposal: Emtest as tester, Tom Breton (Tehom), 2010/05/24
- [Orgmode] Re: Proposal: Emtest as tester, Dan Davison, 2010/05/24
- [Orgmode] Re: Proposal: Emtest as tester, Tom Breton (Tehom), 2010/05/27
- [Orgmode] Re: Proposal: Emtest as tester, Carsten Dominik, 2010/05/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Proposal: Emtest as tester, Martin Pohlack, 2010/05/25