[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change
From: |
Karsten Heymann |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:50:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
> On Apr 6, 2010, at 6:03 PM, Karsten Heymann wrote:
>> Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
>>> On Apr 6, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Karsten Heymann wrote:
>>>> Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>> \usepackage[AUTO]{inputenc}
>>>>> \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
>>>>> \usepackage{graphicx}
>>>>> \usepackage{longtable}
>>>>> \usepackage{float}
>>>>> \usepackage{wrapfig}
>>>>> \usepackage{soul}
>>>>> \usepackage{latexsym}
>>>>> \usepackage{amssymb}
>>>>> \usepackage{hyperref}
[...]
>>> What is is really changing due to these last two
>>> settings (microtype) and tolerance, could you explain in a bit more
>>> detail?
[...]
> Thanks a lot for all this, I will follow your advice.
>
> One final question: Will any of these packages spoil the fun for
> people who want to process through .dvi instead of directly to pdf?
Not as far as I know. hyperref and microtype will run with reduced
features, but apart from that, there should be no problem. Regarding
microtype, I do not know what happens when it is used with the old TeX
or eTeX compiler that was used to created dvi's before pdftex was used
for this too, but that should largely be an academic problem as pdftex
is now used anywhere.
Yours
Karsten
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, (continued)
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/03
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Mark Elston, 2010/04/03
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/03
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Nick Dokos, 2010/04/04
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/04
Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Karsten Heymann, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Karsten Heymann, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change,
Karsten Heymann <=
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Robert Klein, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Thomas S. Dye, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/07
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Karsten Heymann, 2010/04/07
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/07
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Karsten Heymann, 2010/04/07
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Thomas S. Dye, 2010/04/07
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/07
Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Mark Elston, 2010/04/10
Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Thomas S. Dye, 2010/04/10