emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Orgmode] Problem with org-agenda-goto and inline tasks


From: Matt Lundin
Subject: [Orgmode] Problem with org-agenda-goto and inline tasks
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:46:08 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux)

Hi Carsten,

I'd like to report a minor issue with org-agenda-goto and inline tasks.
Let's say one has the following file:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* Here is an entry.
Blah blah blah blah.
*************** Here is an inline task.
*************** END
Blah blah blah blah blah.
*************** TODO Here is a second inline task.
*************** END
Blah blah blah blah blah.
*************** Here is a third inline task
*************** END
Blah blah blah blah blah.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Let's say one also has the following settings:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(setq org-show-hierarchy-above t)
(setq org-show-siblings '((default . nil) (isearch . t) (agenda . t)))
(setq org-show-entry-below '((default . nil) (isearch . t) (agenda . t)))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

If 1) one tries to jump to the TODO from the agenda and 2) the entry is
currently folded, org-show-context reveals only the headlines. E.g.,

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* Here is an entry.
*************** Here is an inline task.
*************** END...
*************** TODO Here is a second inline task.
*************** END...
*************** Here is a third inline task
*************** END...
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Invoking org-cycle on the END headline does nothing, since all headlines
deeper than org-inlinetask-min-level are exempted from cycling. As a
result, the only way to reveal the text in the entry is to cycle the
parent twice (first to close, then to reveal). 

Thanks,
Matt





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]