Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs incompatibility)

[Richard KLINDA]

Almost good, but the variable "s" contains a list, we need to
int-to-char the "car" of that, see attached trivial patch.  It works
with this.  Thank you.

diff --git a/lisp/org-clock.el b/lisp/org-clock.el
index 321dd95..ce309ef 100644
--- a/lisp/org-clock.el
+++ b/lisp/org-clock.el
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ of a different task.")
                    (if (< i 10)
                        (+ i ?0)
                      (+ i (- ?A 10))) m))
-          (if (fboundp 'int-to-char) (setq s (int-to-char s)))
+          (if (fboundp 'int-to-char) (setf (car s) (int-to-char (car s))))
           (push s sel-list)))
        org-clock-history)
       (org-fit-window-to-buffer)


>>>>> Regarding 'Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs 
>>>>> incompatibility)'; Carsten Dominik adds:

  > Hi Richard, I ave fixed this in a different way.  Please verify!

  > - Carsten

  > On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:

  >> Hello Carsten, this failed for me ever since, but as I haven't
  >> needed the functionality I was just lazy to report it.  Oh:) I see
  >> why my patch must be problematic, sorry about that.

  >> The problem is that, when pressed a number as a reply to the
  >> question, this cond command (see below) always goes to the error
  >> clause, because rpl gets the value of ?1 for example, but sel-list
  >> look like ((49 . ...)  (50 . ...)) so the assoc can't find ?1.
  >> With my patch, the assoc finds it because rpl is converted to ASCII
  >> code, but now ?q and ?x clauses don't work.:)

  >> (cond ((eq rpl ?q) nil) ((eq rpl ?x) nil) ((assoc rpl sel-list)
  >> (cdr (assoc rpl sel-list))) (t (error "Invalid task choice %c"
  >> rpl)))

  >> I hope you see what the problem is, I think it must be an XEmacs
  >> issue.

  >>>>>>> Regarding 'Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix
  >>>>>>> (XEmacs incompatibility)'; Carsten Dominik adds:

  >>> Hi Richard, I don't see why this would be necessary?  Under what
  >>> circumstances does this fail?

  >>> - Carsten

  >>> On Dec 1, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:

  >>>> See attached simple patch.

  >>>> From 795d529d622f509f47c2bf17a0139fbe1659cc5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
  >>>> 2001 From: Richard Klinda <address@hidden> Date: Tue, 1 Dec
  >>>> 2009 21:03:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] org-clock:
  >>>> org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs)

  >>>> --- lisp/org-clock.el | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+),
  >>>>     0
  >>>> deletions(-)

  >>>> diff --git a/lisp/org-clock.el b/lisp/org-clock.el index
  >>>> 56dbab5..87017fc 100644
  >>>> --- a/lisp/org-clock.el
  >>>> +++ b/lisp/org-clock.el
  >>>> @@ -344,6 +344,10 @@ of a different task.")
  >>>> (org-fit-window-to-buffer) (message (or prompt "Select task for
  >>>> clocking:")) (setq rpl (read-char-exclusive))
  >>>> + (when (featurep 'xemacs)
  >>>> + ;; in XEmacs read-char-exclusive returns character, instead
  >>>> of
  >>>> + ;; ascii value
  >>>> + (setq rpl (char-octet rpl)))
  >>>> (cond ((eq rpl ?q) nil) ((eq rpl ?x) nil) -- 1.6.2.1


  >>>> -- Richard _______________________________________________
  >>>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies
  >>>> to the list.  address@hidden
  >>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

  >>> - Carsten

  >> -- Richard

  > - Carsten

-- 
Udv, Richard