[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Small bug in the LaTeX exporter? [was: Re: [Orgmode] I_can_not_understa
From: |
Nick Dokos |
Subject: |
Small bug in the LaTeX exporter? [was: Re: [Orgmode] I_can_not_understand_ +strike-through+] |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:31:34 -0400 |
Trying to answer waterloo's question about strike-through, I tried
LaTeX-exporting the following:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* Emphasis and monospace
- *bold*
- /italic/
- _underlined_
- =code=
- ~verbatim~
- +strike-through+
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
but the resulting LaTeX file has the wrong markup for strike-through:
,----
| ...
| \begin{itemize}
| \item \textbf{bold}
| \item \emph{italic}
| \item \underline{underlined}
| \item \texttt{code}
| \item \texttt{verbatim}
| \item \texttt{strike-through}
| \end{itemize}
| ...
`----
The correct markup, according to the TeX FAQ:
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=overstrike,
is obtained using the ulem package:
\usepackage{ulem}
...
\sout{strike-through}
...
The change for \sout is trivial (just change
org-export-latex-emphasis-alist), but adding the ulem package
conditionally is perhaps more difficult. Maybe it should be
added unconditionally? AFAIK, there is no mechanism for including
\usepackages conditionally, is there?
Thanks,
Nick