emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Orgmode] embedded/inherited tags


From: Samuel Wales
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] embedded/inherited tags
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:15:27 -0700

Another possibility is to use your assoc tags and fix it on the search
side.  If you always have a custom search, you can use `( ... ,( ...
)) when you define it.

Then you only need one tag on each task.  The advantage of this is
that if the associations change, you will not need to change the tags.

Currently this requires concatenating strings, but in the future,
according to Carsten, there will be optional Lisp syntax for searches,
which will make it easier.  It might also allow stuff not currently
possible.

On 2009-03-31, Konstantin Antipin <address@hidden> wrote:
> Peter Jones - thanks for the advise. Unfortunately it does not fit to
> me, since I have my todo items in different files.
>
> Eraldo - I was also thinking about this, but I thought that maybe
> solution already exists...
>
> Anyhow, for my it is fixed - I wrote a small package org-assoc-tags,
> that allows to have key-tag and associated tags. For example:
>
> (setq org-assoc-tags '(
>                      ("emacs" "tech")
>                      ("orgmode" "emacs" "tech")
>                      ))
>
> If you assign :emacs: tag, then :tech: will be assigned automatically.
> If you assign :orgmode: tag, then both :emacs: and :tech: will be assigned.
> The package can be found at:
> http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/org-assoc-tags.el
>
> Hopefully it might be helpful for someone,
> Kostya
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Eraldo Helal <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kostya!
>>
>> I am still pretty new to emacs and org-mode, but from what I have read
>> until now...
>> Could you use the tag hook to automatically assign the :tech: tag along
>> with :firefox: and|or :emacs: etc...
>> This is still not exactly what you wished afaics, but it may make things a
>> little more convenient.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 16:47, Konstantin Antipin
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Manish - thank you for the reply.
>>>
>>> Here is what I want in details:
>>> For example, I have following tags :tech: :firefox: :emacs: :orgmode:
>>> In agenda I usually ask only for TODO with :tech: tags, in order to see
>>> actions, related to technical stuff.
>>>
>>> clearly, :firefox: and :emacs: are related to :tech: tag. It would be
>>> convenient to introduce tag hierarchy:
>>> every todo-item with :emacs: (or :firefox: ) tag only should show up in
>>> agenda, when I query for :tech: tag.
>>> I understand, that every time I assign :emacs: tag I can assign :tech:
>>> tag as well, and this will do the work, but it is not convenient.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is such mechanism exists?
>>>
>>> My todo's are scatterd over the files, thus I can not use usual tag
>>> hierarchy, that is controlled by, for example, "org-use-tag-inheritance".
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Kostya
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Manish <address@hidden>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Konstantin Antipin wrote:
>>>>  > Dear org-users,
>>>>  > Is there any way to make tags inherited from another tag?
>>>>  > For example, I have following tags:
>>>>  > :tech:
>>>>  >  :emacs:
>>>>  >   :orgmode:
>>>>  >  :ubuntu:
>>>>  >
>>>>  > :other:
>>>>
>>>> Could you please a little elaborate more on this?  Also please take a
>>>> look at variable "org-use-tag-inheritance".
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Manish
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>>> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
>>> address@hidden
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>


-- 
Myalgic encephalomyelitis denialism is causing death (decades early;
Jason et al. 2006) and severe suffering (worse than nearly all other
diseases studied; e.g. Schweitzer et al. 1995) and grossly corrupting
science.  http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/What_Is_ME_What_Is_CFS.htm




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]