[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Export as HTML
From: |
Matthew Lundin |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Export as HTML |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:45:53 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
> I would not object to renaming the outer div to "container" or
> whatever other name we can find a consensus for.
>
> I think I would object to removing it alltogether, I cannot see the
> benefit of doing that.
>
> On the other hand, I cannot really see ths issue here, because the
> name in the templates could be changed as well, and I would suspect
> that this is a common issue name clashes when using templates.
Completely agreed. This is not an important problem. Anyone who chooses
to use org-mode for publishing a web site should know a little bit about
hacking css. And as Sebastian R. suggests, we should certainly *not*
change org-export because of some random css template!
Let me clarify that I am perfectly happy with the current behavior. And
I have a vested interest in *not* having it changed, since I'm lazy and
don't want to have to change my css file again. :)
- Matt
- [Orgmode] Export as HTML, Sébastien Vauban, 2009/03/30
- Re: [Orgmode] Export as HTML, roc lee, 2009/03/30
- Re: [Orgmode] Export as HTML, roc lee, 2009/03/30
- [Orgmode] Re: Export as HTML, Sébastien Vauban, 2009/03/30
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Export as HTML, Sebastian Rose, 2009/03/30
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Export as HTML, Matthew Lundin, 2009/03/30
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Export as HTML, Carsten Dominik, 2009/03/30
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Export as HTML,
Matthew Lundin <=
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Export as HTML, Carsten Dominik, 2009/03/30
- [Orgmode] Re: Export as HTML, Sébastien Vauban, 2009/03/30
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Export as HTML, Sebastian Rose, 2009/03/30
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Export as HTML, Carsten Dominik, 2009/03/30
Re: [Orgmode] Export as HTML, Carsten Dominik, 2009/03/30