Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Bulk] Re: clocksum and archived trees

[Carsten Dominik]

On Mar 20, 2009, at 3:59 AM, Jota Pin wrote:

> Le jeudi 19 mars 2009, Peter Jones a écrit :
> > Jota Pin <address@hidden> writes:
> > > I tried to figure out how to avoid having archived subtrees to  
> > > contribute
> > > to the sum of times showed with "Display Times" c-c c-x c-d.
> >
> > I've been wondering something along the same lines myself.  When
> > switching to column view via C-c C-x C-c it can sometimes take a long
> > time because of archive items.


Hi Peter, this case makes sense, for speed, and I have added
a variable org-columns-skip-archived-trees, with default t.

> > I haven't gotten around to looking into this yet.  Maybe I'll try  
> > to fix
> > this tomorrow when I get some time.
>
> Thanks, this would be great.
>
> Maybe an explanation of the reason to doing so is helpful:
>
> I like to see the time spent per subtree, but at the same time I do  
> want to
> keep the archives in their original location: I use sometimes  
> archives tags
> to store versions of the same subtree, and of course the clocks must  
> no count
> twice there...

Hi Jota,

for this case I am not sure.  The purpose or archiving is to mark a tree
as finished, but clearly any clocking times from this tree should still
contribute.  I see that you are using ARCHIVE to mark a second version
of a given tree.  If you need multiple versions, why don't you keep
older versions in another file or so?

Are there more opinions about this?  Maybe I am seeing it wrong.....

- Carsten


> Same question for clock tables.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode