[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited
From: |
Sivaram Neelakantan |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:48:30 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.2 (windows-nt) |
Paul R <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> Can others express their views on pros and cons of the two following
> usages :
>
> * Usage 1, anonymous footnotes
>
> Karate or karate-do is a martial art developed in the Ryukyu Islands
> from indigenous fighting methods and Chinese kenpō[fn:: Kenpo is the
> name of several martial arts].
[...]
And then we will have that one feature request to cross reference a
previous footnote! :-) In the above case, how would a person go
about asking someone to refer to an earlier footnote?
> * Usage 2, keyword named footnotes
>
> Karate or karate-do is a martial art developed in the Ryukyu Islands
> from indigenous fighting methods and Chinese kenpō[fn:kenpo]. It is
> primarily a striking art using punching, kicking, knee and elbow strikes
> and open-handed techniques such as knife-hands and ridge-hands.
>
> [fn:kenpo] Kenpo is the name of several martial arts
Unless I've got it wrong, wouldn't it be better to do something like
[fn:kenpo { Kenpo is the name of several martial arts}]
(keep the keyword and definition in one place?)
And all future references go as 'see [fn:kenpo] to understand the
meaning'. Presumably when exported, all these keywords stuff
disappears and are replaced by standard LaTeX style footnote numbers,
right?
[...]
sivaram
--
- [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited, (continued)
- [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited, Paul R, 2008/12/17
- Re: [Orgmode] Footnotes and org-export, revisited, Carsten Dominik, 2008/12/17
- [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited, Paul R, 2008/12/17
- [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited, Carsten Dominik, 2008/12/17
- [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited, Paul R, 2008/12/17
- [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited, Carsten Dominik, 2008/12/17
- [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited, Paul R, 2008/12/17
- [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited, Scot Becker, 2008/12/17
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited, Matthew Lundin, 2008/12/17
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited, Scot Becker, 2008/12/17
- [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited,
Sivaram Neelakantan <=
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited, Carsten Dominik, 2008/12/18
- [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited, Sivaram Neelakantan, 2008/12/18
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited, Peter Frings, 2008/12/18
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited, Peter Frings, 2008/12/18
Re: [Orgmode] Footnotes and org-export, revisited, Jörg Hagmann, 2008/12/17