emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Remember and then refile


From: Carsten Dominik
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Re: Remember and then refile
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 11:00:40 +0100


On Feb 1, 2008, at 12:21 AM, Steven Lumos wrote:

Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:

On Jan 18, 2008, at 11:19 PM, Steven Lumos wrote:

Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
On Jan 18, 2008, at 9:40 PM, Steven Lumos wrote:

Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
This will be in 5.19.  Thanks for the proposal!.

- Carsten

Hi.

Have you considered somehow merging the tree selection and
minibuffer
with completion methods so that both are available simultaneously?

Could you please be more specific?

Thanks.

- Carsten

Maybe. :-)

Currently, C-u C-c C-c in remember uses this "Select a destination
location for the note" mode where you navigate the org tree in the
usual way and then RET to select a headline.

On the other hand, org-refile uses the minibuffer and you type a
headline, with completion and history.

So recently I've been thinking it should be possible (though only
arguably desirable) to allow both of these modes to be active at once,
so movement commands would navigate the tree and typing commands would
append to the minibuffer.

There are key conflicts that need to be worked out, but I think it
could be done.  For one example, TAB could do completion if there is
text in the minibuffer, and tree navigation otherwise.

Hmm, this sound like over-complx to me.  I would use the interface
that makes sense most of the time and then move by hand in the
remaining cases.  Or do you think tat the interface you want
is dependent on the template you are using?

- Carsten

That could be.  I'm still very much figuring out what the interface
between my brain and org looks like, and not currently using any of
the established planning styles.  I've only been using the agenda for
about half as long as I've been using org for example.

From my perspective, I saw two methods to do exactly the same thing(*),
which led to thinking about the advantages of each, which led to
thinking why not just merge them and have the advantages of both.

yes, they do the exact same thing in the way that they achieve the same, but
in different ways.  However, what you ask for is difficult to program and
also (IMO) confusing.  I am dropping it for now.  If you want to switch
between the two interfaces, just define a command that toggles the
corresponding variable.  Then you can switch just before finishing remember
with C-c C-c.

- Carsten

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]