[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Re: When is a TODO really a TODO ? ...
From: |
Bernt Hansen |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Re: When is a TODO really a TODO ? ... |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:21:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
> you make an interesting point. The fact that items with a process
> state are called TODO
> items had two roots:
>
> - historically: Initially, there was only TODO and DONE.
>
> - pedagogically: Org-mode tries to be "easy-entry, but then
> lots of stuff under the hood".
> This is why TODO items are introduced the way they are.
> You said that you have been confused by this, so maybe it
> is not the right way after all. Any proposals on how to
> address this in the docs?
>
Maybe just call todo items 'Tasks' and their current state is 'TODO',
'DONE', etc ?
,----
| * TODO Thing 1
| I'm a task
| ** NEXT Thing 1 first item
| Me too! work on me next
| * Some random information
| I'm not a task since I don't need to be 'done'
| * DONE Completed task
| I'm a completed task
`----
Bernt
- [Orgmode] When is a TODO really a TODO ? ..., Richard G Riley, 2007/11/04
- Re: [Orgmode] When is a TODO really a TODO ? ..., Carsten Dominik, 2007/11/05
- [Orgmode] Re: When is a TODO really a TODO ? ...,
Bernt Hansen <=
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: When is a TODO really a TODO ? ..., Bastien, 2007/11/05
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: When is a TODO really a TODO ? ..., Carsten Dominik, 2007/11/06
- Message not available
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: When is a TODO really a TODO ? ..., Bastien, 2007/11/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: When is a TODO really a TODO ? ..., Richard G Riley, 2007/11/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: When is a TODO really a TODO ? ..., Bastien, 2007/11/06