[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69
From: |
Eddward DeVilla |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69 |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:18:56 -0500 |
On 3/21/07, Leo <address@hidden> wrote:
On 2007-03-21, Carsten Dominik said:
> - You can now use multiple sets of TODO keywords in the same
> buffer. For example, you may put the following three lines
> into a file:
>
> #+SEQ_TODO: TODO DONE
> #+SEQ_TODO: REPORT BUG KNOWNCAUSE RESOLVED
> #+TYP_TODO: Fred Laura Peter Me OK
I feel this too complicated. Isn't it more intuitive and consistent to
make this work like #+CATEGORY and #+ARCHIVE?
You meaning having one sequence going at a time and replacing it with
each use of #+SEQ_TODO: or #+TYP_TODO:? I don't think I'd like that,
but I could see how other might use it and how having multiple
sequences at once could polute the names space so to speak.
How about a generalize syntax where you name a sequence. If you don't
give a name you are defining/replacing the null or default sequnce.
So:
===============================================
#+SEQ_TODO: TODO DONE
#+SEQ_TODO: (BUG-TRACKING) REPORT BUG KNOWNCAUSE RESOLVED
#+TYP_TODO: (TEAM) Fred Laura Peter Me OK
.
.
.
#+SEQ_TODO: TODO WORKING DONE
Now the default is redefined
.
.
.
#+TYP_TODO: (TEAM)
The TEAM todo type is effectively gone.
===============================================
This would let me have my set of TODO 'types'. It would allow others
to redifne the default todo sequence without having them all at once.
It might be a pita to implement though.
Edd
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69, (continued)
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69, Jason F. McBrayer, 2007/03/21
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69, Carsten Dominik, 2007/03/21
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69, Carsten Dominik, 2007/03/21
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69, Jason F. McBrayer, 2007/03/21
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69, Carsten Dominik, 2007/03/22
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69, Jason F. McBrayer, 2007/03/22
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69, Carsten Dominik, 2007/03/22
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69, Jason F. McBrayer, 2007/03/22
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69, Carsten Dominik, 2007/03/26
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69, Eddward DeVilla, 2007/03/21
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69,
Eddward DeVilla <=