emacs-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-diffs] master a84cef9: Port better to x86 -fexcess-precision=fast


From: Paul Eggert
Subject: [Emacs-diffs] master a84cef9: Port better to x86 -fexcess-precision=fast
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2018 18:31:33 -0400 (EDT)

branch: master
commit a84cef90957f2379cc0df6bd908317fc441971ce
Author: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
Commit: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>

    Port better to x86 -fexcess-precision=fast
    
    Problem reported by Eli Zaretskii in:
    https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2018-08/msg00380.html
    * src/data.c (arithcompare): Work around incompatibility
    between gcc -fexcess-precision=fast and the C standard on x86,
    by capturing the results of floating-point comparisons before
    the excess precision spontaneously decays.  Although this fix
    might not work in general, it does work here and is probably
    good enough for the platforms we care about.
---
 src/data.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/data.c b/src/data.c
index c8a9c6b..7b8dd45 100644
--- a/src/data.c
+++ b/src/data.c
@@ -2492,7 +2492,7 @@ arithcompare (Lisp_Object num1, Lisp_Object num2,
 {
   double f1, f2;
   EMACS_INT i1, i2;
-  bool fneq;
+  bool lt, eq, gt;
   bool test;
 
   CHECK_NUMBER_COERCE_MARKER (num1);
@@ -2502,10 +2502,13 @@ arithcompare (Lisp_Object num1, Lisp_Object num2,
     return bignumcompare (num1, num2, comparison);
 
   /* If either arg is floating point, set F1 and F2 to the 'double'
-     approximations of the two arguments, and set FNEQ if floating-point
-     comparison reports that F1 is not equal to F2, possibly because F1
-     or F2 is a NaN.  Regardless, set I1 and I2 to integers that break
-     ties if the floating-point comparison is either not done or reports
+     approximations of the two arguments, and set LT, EQ, and GT to
+     the <, ==, > floating-point comparisons of F1 and F2
+     respectively, taking care to avoid problems if either is a NaN,
+     and trying to avoid problems on platforms where variables (in
+     violation of the C standard) can contain excess precision.
+     Regardless, set I1 and I2 to integers that break ties if the
+     floating-point comparison is either not done or reports
      equality.  */
 
   if (FLOATP (num1))
@@ -2528,7 +2531,9 @@ arithcompare (Lisp_Object num1, Lisp_Object num2,
             to I2 will break the tie correctly.  */
          i1 = f2 = i2 = XFIXNUM (num2);
        }
-      fneq = f1 != f2;
+      lt = f1 < f2;
+      eq = f1 == f2;
+      gt = f1 > f2;
     }
   else
     {
@@ -2539,39 +2544,49 @@ arithcompare (Lisp_Object num1, Lisp_Object num2,
             converse of comparing float to integer (see above).  */
          i2 = f1 = i1;
          f2 = XFLOAT_DATA (num2);
-         fneq = f1 != f2;
+         lt = f1 < f2;
+         eq = f1 == f2;
+         gt = f1 > f2;
        }
       else
        {
          i2 = XFIXNUM (num2);
-         fneq = false;
+         eq = true;
        }
     }
 
+  if (eq)
+    {
+      /* Break a floating-point tie by comparing the integers.  */
+      lt = i1 < i2;
+      eq = i1 == i2;
+      gt = i1 > i2;
+    }
+
   switch (comparison)
     {
     case ARITH_EQUAL:
-      test = !fneq && i1 == i2;
+      test = eq;
       break;
 
     case ARITH_NOTEQUAL:
-      test = fneq || i1 != i2;
+      test = !eq;
       break;
 
     case ARITH_LESS:
-      test = fneq ? f1 < f2 : i1 < i2;
+      test = lt;
       break;
 
     case ARITH_LESS_OR_EQUAL:
-      test = fneq ? f1 <= f2 : i1 <= i2;
+      test = lt | eq;
       break;
 
     case ARITH_GRTR:
-      test = fneq ? f1 > f2 : i1 > i2;
+      test = gt;
       break;
 
     case ARITH_GRTR_OR_EQUAL:
-      test = fneq ? f1 >= f2 : i1 >= i2;
+      test = gt | eq;
       break;
 
     default:



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]