emacs-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/man/gnu.texi


From: Juri Linkov
Subject: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/man/gnu.texi
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 02:18:38 -0400

Index: emacs/man/gnu.texi
diff -c emacs/man/gnu.texi:1.5 emacs/man/gnu.texi:1.6
*** emacs/man/gnu.texi:1.5      Thu Jul  7 22:54:34 2005
--- emacs/man/gnu.texi  Tue Jul 12 06:18:38 2005
***************
*** 382,394 ****
  difficult.
  
  People who have studied the issue of intellectual property
! address@hidden the 80s I had not yet realized how confusing it was
  to speak of ``the issue'' of ``intellectual property.''  That term is
  obviously biased; more subtle is the fact that it lumps together
  various disparate laws which raise very different issues.  Nowadays I
  urge people to reject the term ``intellectual property'' entirely,
  lest it lead others to suppose that those laws form one coherent
! issue.  The way to be clear is to to discuss patents, copyrights, and
  trademarks separately.  See
  @uref{http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml} for more
  explanation of how this term spreads confusion and bias.} carefully
--- 382,394 ----
  difficult.
  
  People who have studied the issue of intellectual property
! address@hidden the 80s I had not yet realized how confusing it was
  to speak of ``the issue'' of ``intellectual property.''  That term is
  obviously biased; more subtle is the fact that it lumps together
  various disparate laws which raise very different issues.  Nowadays I
  urge people to reject the term ``intellectual property'' entirely,
  lest it lead others to suppose that those laws form one coherent
! issue.  The way to be clear is to discuss patents, copyrights, and
  trademarks separately.  See
  @uref{http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml} for more
  explanation of how this term spreads confusion and bias.} carefully




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]