emacs-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/man/calc.texi


From: Jay Belanger
Subject: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/man/calc.texi
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 15:48:39 -0500

Index: emacs/man/calc.texi
diff -c emacs/man/calc.texi:1.36 emacs/man/calc.texi:1.37
*** emacs/man/calc.texi:1.36    Tue Jan  4 19:48:17 2005
--- emacs/man/calc.texi Tue Jan  4 20:33:38 2005
***************
*** 5984,5991 ****
  with any integrand @samp{f(t)}.  Define a @kbd{z s} command and
  @code{Si} function that implement this.  You will need to edit the
  default argument list a bit.  As a test, @samp{Si(1)} should return
! 0.946083.  (Hint:  @code{ninteg} will run a lot faster if you reduce
! the precision to, say, six digits beforehand.)
  @xref{Programming Answer 1, 1}. (@bullet{})
  
  The simplest way to do real ``programming'' of Emacs is to define a
--- 5984,5992 ----
  with any integrand @samp{f(t)}.  Define a @kbd{z s} command and
  @code{Si} function that implement this.  You will need to edit the
  default argument list a bit.  As a test, @samp{Si(1)} should return
! 0.946083. (If you don't get this answer, you might want to check that
! Calc is in Radians mode.  Also, @code{ninteg} will run a lot faster if
! you reduce the precision to, say, six digits beforehand.)
  @xref{Programming Answer 1, 1}. (@bullet{})
  
  The simplest way to do real ``programming'' of Emacs is to define a




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]