Re: User experience: eglot configuration

[Harald Kirsch]

On 30.01.25 11:00, Rudolf Schlatte wrote:
> Harald Kirsch <pifpafpuf@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > On 29.01.25 21:01, chad wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 8:06 AM Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
> > > <paaguti@gmail.com <mailto:paaguti@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > >      ... Or rephrasing:
> > >      if the LSP wants JSON, why elisp -> JSON and not JSON directly?
> > >      Would be easier
> > >      to debug...
> > >
> > >
> > > Am I misunderstanding, or are you saying that it would be easier to
> > > write raw JSON than lisp?
> >
> > Yes. 100%! In particular for people who would use Emacs as a code editor
> > or IDE replacement for their language, one which much more likely had
> > them look at JSON configs already in whatever context, than at Lisp.
>
> Is there an existing standard for such language server configuration
> info, or would it be necessary to invent and document a JSON format for
> this?

See
https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specifications/lsp/3.17/specification/#initializeParams

There is the

/**
 * User provided initialization options.
 */
initializationOptions?: LSPAny;

part where each server has its own things to configure, obviously very
much depending on the programming language.

Harald

--
--------------+---------------------------------------
Harald Kirsch | HaraldKi@nrw.social