Re: "Final" version of tty child frames

[Gerd Möllmann]

martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> writes:

>>> But then the question is
>>> what do we expect from set_cursor_from_row to do when the correct
>>> position of the cursor is obscured by the child frame?
>>
>> That's the question, yes.
>
> In a fix I don't like I've put it on the first character on the right of
> any child frame encountered.  But then the real point position will be
> still hidden under the child frame.  So when you lean on C-f (in a
> non-bidi context), the cursor immediately jumps to that position on the
> right of any child frame but point still has to catch up with that
> situation and only when it does that the cursor will continue moving.
> Disconcerting and ugly.
>
> martin

Eli said cursor position < 0 means "don't know". Maybe try that?